Boots Number 8 of 9 in Baby Feeding Bottles

Not widely used. Low product quality and overall ratings.

Positive

  • Some comments say their babies like the bottles.

Negative

  • Low Product Quality rating
  • Low Overall Rating

"The bottles are good value for money and average bottles ideal for older babies."
Selected Review

Description

The Boots standard neck feeding bottle is ideal for feeding your baby expressed milk or formula. Can be used in all sterilisers. Bottle and components made from Polypropylene. Teat made from silicone. Boots standard neck feeding bottles have been awarded 'Best Budget Buy' bottle by Mother and Baby magazine June 2014.

More Product Information

RSP £ 0.99

296 Ratings

Overall Rating

74
101
88
15
18
Value for Money 3/5
Quality 3/5
Awareness 2/5
Loyalty 0/5
Popularity 0/5

Most Helpful Reviews

The bottles are good value for money and average bottles ideal for older babies.

28/05/2016
Value for Money 3/5
Quality 3/5

Is this review helpful? (1)

These are very good. Sturdy teats, we'll priced, good allrounder.

29/05/2016
Value for Money 5/5
Quality 4/5

Is this review helpful? (1)

Reviews (41)

Currently showing all 4 star reviews. Reset

good quality and durable

15/09/2017
Value for Money 4/5
Quality 3/5

Is this review helpful? (0)

Good value for money would recommend mums to try it

18/08/2017
Value for Money 4/5
Quality 3/5

Is this review helpful? (0)

Never had any issues

18/05/2017
Value for Money 4/5
Quality 4/5

Is this review helpful? (0)

Fairly good priced, good design and texture of teet.. Flow is quite fast though

18/03/2017
Value for Money 4/5
Quality 3/5

Is this review helpful? (0)

Good value and easy to hold

07/03/2017
Value for Money 4/5
Quality 3/5

Is this review helpful? (0)

Good quality

21/02/2017
Value for Money 4/5
Quality 3/5

Is this review helpful? (0)

Value for money but found it hard to encourage my baby to latch on

06/01/2017
Value for Money 5/5
Quality 3/5

Is this review helpful? (0)

Good to use, cost-effective.

20/11/2016
Value for Money 4/5
Quality 3/5

Is this review helpful? (0)

Could be cheaper but good

18/11/2016
Value for Money 4/5
Quality 3/5

Is this review helpful? (0)

NOt bad quality

28/10/2016
Value for Money 3/5
Quality 4/5

Is this review helpful? (0)